LexAgentica

1. Name your jurisdiction and choose your legal tradition in the top bar. The tradition setting rewrites the guardian article and the optional comparative-law article in the doctrinal language your courts already know (common law, Romano-Germanic, Asian legal principles, or mixed).
2. Skim the gazette on the right. It always shows the complete, renumbered Act exactly as currently configured, so you can read your law at any moment.
3. Walk through the chapters on the left, block by block. Press the stamp to switch a provision between Enacted and Omitted. Open a block to read the full clause, the plain-language rationale explaining why it exists, and the legal sources it is drawn from.
4. Choose your variants. Five articles offer real policy alternatives: military applications (carve-out or inclusion), the liability ceiling (capped with a public fund, or unlimited), the supervisory model (a dedicated authority, or a lean model relying on an existing regulator and international cooperation), and the privacy and cybersecurity articles (overlay on an existing general law, or a self-contained baseline if your country has none).
5. Set the parameters. The "Adjustable parameters" panel below holds the figures injected into the clauses: reporting deadlines, log retention, audit and review cycles, prescription periods, the complaint deadline. They are drafting defaults, not recommendations.
6. Amend where national drafting requires. Inside any block, Amend text opens an editor; saved amendments are marked in the gazette and the export, and can be reset to the model text at any time.
7. Watch the alerts above the gazette. Coherence errors (an article depending on one you omitted) should be resolved; advisory notes (departures from the international core, overlay models assuming laws you may not have) deserve a deliberate decision.
8. Review the "Open decisions" annex at the end of the gazette: every dotted-underlined phrase delegates a real political choice to regulation. Assign each one to a ministry or committee before the bill goes further.
9. Save and share. Save config (.json) produces a portable file of your entire configuration, so committees can exchange, compare and merge versions; Load config restores one. Your work also autosaves in this browser where permitted.
10. Export. Download law (.txt) produces the consolidated Act with the open-decisions annex and source endnotes; Print renders the gazette alone. Then hand it to national counsel: this tool prepares a bill, it does not replace legislative drafting, translation or constitutional review.

Purpose and audience

LexAgentica is a comparative drafting aid for parliaments, ministries and civil-society drafters who need a coherent national law on agentic AI: systems that autonomously plan, decide and act, including concluding contracts and executing transactions. It converts the option space into modular blocks so that legislating becomes a sequence of explicit, documented choices rather than a blank page.

Normative spine

Every block hangs on two duties from moral philosophy given legal form: the positive responsibility to act to prevent foreseeable danger (perimeter of action, guardian role modelled on the keeper of an animal, meaningful human control, ex-ante checks and ex-post monitoring) and the negative responsibility to refrain from creating risks that have not been reasonably assessed and mitigated (the prohibition of unassessed risk creation, the red lines, the protection of persons and of the habitability of the planet, including the Jevons rebound effect).

Comparative method

Rather than inventing rules, the blocks transpose mechanisms that have already worked in analogous fields, each cited in its sources list: liability channelling, mandatory financial security and international peer review from nuclear law (Paris and Vienna Conventions, INES, OSART); attribution of electronic-agent contracts from UNCITRAL and the Singapore Electronic Transactions Act; iterative governance and sandboxes from the Singapore Model AI Governance Framework; identification, human determination and the termination obligation from the Universal Guidelines on AI; absolute prohibitions from the international AI red-lines statements; value-chain due diligence from the CSDDD and the UN Guiding Principles; zero-trust architecture from NIST SP 800-207.

Architecture: core and periphery

Three blocks (red lines, incident reporting, agent identity) are marked as the proposed international core, because they only function if compatible across borders; omitting them triggers a warning. Everything else is national periphery, configurable by variant, parameter and amendment, under a proportionality and innovation principle so that obligations scale with documented risk.

Honesty about limits

Delegated decisions ("set by regulation") are deliberately flagged rather than hidden: that is where the political substance lives. The coherence engine checks structural dependencies, not legal validity. The model texts are English-language drafting proposals; they are not legal advice, and any bill derived from them requires national legislative drafting, official translation and constitutional review. Configurations exported as JSON are versioned so that divergent national adaptations remain comparable.

These figures are drafting defaults, not recommendations. Every remaining "set by regulation" phrase is flagged in the gazette as an open decision for Parliament or the executive.